Page Comparison

...

• Archives: Workflow is working well.
• Is a another curation across collection meeting needed, or can curators just check Hydra to see what is currently in and adjust their plans based on that?
  • No replies. Michelle noted this idea posed by Michelle was good.
• Should people be allowed to download images? If so what quality do we want to provide?
  • At the start of the project there was excitement about a more open access goal.
    • Rights and Reproduction (R&R) tends to cost more in salary than is gained from fees.
  • Jim asked about embedding metadata in the photos with notes about the CHF being the creator if the image was used widely.
    
    • It was asked how likely users would be to check this
    • Another issue brought up was how many online tools strip said metadata.
  • Hillary mentioned an intermediary step to have users check a box to acknowledged the R&R  terms and details
    • This was mentioned due to scholars and publishers often contacting R&R to confirm the permissions. This might be something they can point to.
      • JSTOR was specifically mentioned as an example.
    • Public domain works should be clear that they do not need any permissions
    • Should R&R data be copied into Hydra or linked to the website?
    • Anna mentioned that the rights metadata could be there and a link be placed to full R&R data on another page.
    • Sarah brought up the difference between the legal requirements and the best practice ethical goals when dealing with this issue and that is a good idea to distinguish between them.
    • A broad concern was to make sure that the user understands what their rights are in regard to the image, be as clear as possible what they can do.
      • An example was mentioned by Jim about another library adding a copyright warning on public domain works. (I forgot to type the full name of the University library in question -Dan)
    • A citation link/page/object was mentioned as a way to make things easier. (Not sure how this compares to the current citation tool export links. -Dan)
• A desire for analytics about downloads and other use was brought up.
  • Some of this is possible in Google Analytics, other parts may use the Sufia reporting tools.
• Cat gave a list of current goals for facet browsing:

  Anchor
  facetbrowsing facetbrowsing

  • Subject/Topic
  • Maker/Creator
  • Genre
  • Type
  • Division
  • Date
  • Rights
  • Lower priority facets were listed as
    • Language
    • Place
    • Medium
    • Collection
  • A date slider was mentioned as a desired tool for the date facet.
    
    • Date boxes would also be included.
    • Anna explained how fuzzy dates are handled in the index (1910s indexes as 1910, 1911, etc in the index)
• Do we need to bring content from the current website collections into Hydra?
  • Archives: No
  • Photos: No
  • Museum: No
  • Modern Library: No
• Moving forward there will be user groups for the linked data work.
• When Sufia 7 is ready there will be workflow training on the new aspects.
• Oral histories will wait until after the soft launch for integration.
• A second developer is in the works thanks to Gore fund and board money. They might work on oral histories.

...